ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting infection after radical resection of gastric cancer.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of preoperative prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium after gastric cancer surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting infection after radical resection of gastric cancer (GC). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study clinical data of patients who underwent radical resection of GC in BenQ Medical Center in Nanjing, China from January 2020 to April 2024 was retrospectively selected. Patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort and the validation cohort in a ratio of 7:3. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the characteristics and screen the independent risk factors of infection after radical resection of GC to construct a predictive nomogram model. The prediction performance and clinical utility of the nomogram model were evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Records of 581 patients with GC after radical resection were included in this study. The incidence of postoperative infection was 19.1% (111/581). The nomogram model that included age, hypertension, open surgery, operation duration, lymphocyte count, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) showed sufficient prediction accuracy, with the AUC of the training set and validation set of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.778-0.888) and 0.859 (0.859; 0.777-0.941), respectively. The calibration curve showed that the model's predicted value is basically consistent with the actual value, and the calibration effect is good. DCA also shows that the predictive model has good clinical utility. Conclusions: The established nomogram model has a good predictive value in predicting infection after radical resection of GC in this study, which may be a reliable tool for clinicians to identify patients with GC at high risk of infection after radical gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.