ReviewPakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the risk of cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epitranscriptomic modifications in embryonic development: insights into natural and ART-induced mechanisms and implications.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Does the risk of neurodevelopment disorders in children differ with different ART treatments? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of assisted reproductive technology (ART) on the risk of cerebral palsy (CP) in offspring. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases for observational studies that investigated the link between ART and CP as a pregnancy outcome that were published until 15th January, 2024. Only studies that provided adjusted effect sizes for the outcome of interest were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was reported along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Thirteen studies were included. Pregnancy that was achieved with the help of ART correlated with significantly higher risk of CP in offspring (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.94) compared to natural conception. The risk of CP in singleton pregnancies achieved through ART was elevated (OR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.58). while no such increase in the risk was detected in cases of multiple pregnancies (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.20) and preterm births (OR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.28). Studies published prior to the year 2010 showed an association of ART with elevated rates of CP (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.44). No difference was detected in studies published after the year 2010 (OR 1.40, 95% CI: 0.97, 2.03). Conclusion: Our findings suggest a modest increase in the risk of CP that is linked to ART. However, the analysis is hindered by a small number of studies and notable heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses did not show significant associations for multiple or preterm pregnancies, suggesting that other factors beyond ART may be responsible. Factors such as maternal age, underlying infertility, and pregnancy complications might contribute to the observed risk of CP rather than ART itself. Higher-quality studies are required to validate our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.