ReviewSurgical neurology international2025
Pseudoaneurysm development in extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery: Diagnostic challenges and surgical solutions.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pseudoaneurysm formation at the anastomotic site of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery is a rare but potentially severe complication. Due to its unpredictable nature and associated risks, early detection and appropriate management are crucial. However, the rarity of this condition makes diagnosis and treatment challenging. This review explores the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic strategies, and management options for pseudoaneurysms in EC-IC bypass procedures. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE database to identify studies related to pseudoaneurysm formation following EC-IC bypass surgery. The search algorithm applied was (((Pseudoaneurysm) AND (Extracranial) AND (Intracranial)) AND ((Bypass) OR (Revascularization) OR (Anastomosis))). Studies were included if they reported on pseudoaneurysm formation at the anastomotic site of EC-IC bypass procedures, including case reports, case series, retrospective studies, and reviews. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies focusing solely on nonanastomotic aneurysms, unrelated cerebrovascular procedures, or insufficient clinical data. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of five studies were selected for detailed analysis. The extracted data included patient demographics, clinical presentation, imaging modalities used for diagnosis, treatment strategies, and postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: Pseudoaneurysms at EC-IC bypass sites pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Given the potential for delayed complications, early detection, and individualized treatment strategies are essential. Long-term follow-up with serial imaging is necessary to monitor for recurrence and ensure optimal patient outcomes. Greater awareness and reporting of these cases will contribute to improved understanding and management of this rare complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.