ReviewJournal of public health in Africa2025
The impact of educational interventions on the competence of nurses and midwives in neonatal resuscitation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal mortality is still a significant global public health issue and most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite extensive government and nongovernment campaigns, the neonatal fatality rate in this region remains unacceptable. Aim: This review evaluates the efficacy of educational resuscitation interventions on the knowledge and skills of nurses and midwives about newborns resuscitation. Setting: Knowledge and skills of nurses and midwives about newborns resuscitation in sub-Saharan Africa. Method: The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the quality of evidence from the included studies. A search was conducted across seven databases from 2000 to 2024. A cumulative number of 912 studies were retrieved. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022332734). Result: The final selection comprised 16 articles. An average grading score of 2.4, suggesting low to moderate evidence. The programmes included the Basic Emergency Obstetrics and Newborn Care training, the Helping Babies Breathe (HBB), the UK Resuscitation Guidelines, the American Heart Council Guidelines, the American Neonatal Resuscitation Program and the Safe Delivery Application. The intervention resulted in considerable improvements in resuscitation knowledge and skills. Contribution: This study highlights the need for high-quality data and prioritise locally and culturally acceptable interventions to reduce neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.