ArticleBiochemia medica2025
Impact of fasting duration on LDL cholesterol concentrations estimated by the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A paradigm shift is occurring in lipid testing, as fasting is no longer required. We aimed to determine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations calculated using three different equations, along with the components used in these calculations, vary with different fasting durations in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods: The concentrations of LDL-C were calculated using the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations, along with the lipid components involved in these equations, depending on time since the last meal in a cohort of 77,300 outpatients at a community hospital. The study population was divided into groups according to fasting durations by 2-hour intervals. A general linear model was applied to identify differences between fasting and nonfasting groups. Results: Regardless of the calculation method, LDL-C concentrations varied with fasting duration for up to 8-10 hours. The greatest absolute mean differences in LDL-C concentrations between fasting and nonfasting states were - 0.32, - 0.30, and - 0.26 mmol/L when using the Friedewald, Sampson/NIH, and Martin-Hopkins equations, respectively. Among the equation components, triglyceride concentrations were the most sensitive to fasting duration, remaining elevated for 4-6 hours after the last meal, while total cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations decreased for up to 8-10 hours postprandially. However, HDL-C concentrations remained relatively stable. Conclusions: The variation in postprandial LDL-C concentrations was observed not to differ between the three calculation methods and reached negligible concentrations after at least 8 hours of fasting. If LDL-C concentrations measured in a nonfasting state are near clinical decision thresholds, subsequent lipid measurement should be performed in a fasting state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.