Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469648›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Administering the ACL-RSI Before or After ACL Functional Testing: Does It Matter?

Daniel Larson, Justin Rohrberg, Daniel Lorenz, Nicole Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel LarsonPhysical Therapy OrthoKansas/Lawrence Memorial Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3463-8980
Justin RohrbergPhysical Therapy OrthoKansas/Lawrence Memorial Hospital.
Daniel LorenzPhysical Therapy OrthoKansas/Lawrence Memorial Hospital.
Nicole ClarkStefani Doctor of Physical Therapy Program University of Saint Mary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psychological readiness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), as measured by the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, has become a critical factor in determining an athlete's ability to return to sport. While the ACL-RSI is widely used, the influence of the timing of its administration in relation to physical performance testing has not been studied. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the differences in ACL-RSI scores and subscale scores assessed up to one week before versus immediately after exposure to objective physical performance testing, but prior to reviewing the results with the athlete. Study Design: Prospective case series. Methods: Fifty athletes recovering from ACLR participated in this study. The ACL-RSI questionnaire was administered within one week prior to and immediately after completing a return-to-sport physical performance testing battery. The testing included elements assessing maximum volitional force production, explosiveness, and hopping and landing ability. Changes in overall ACL-RSI scores and its subscales (emotions, confidence in performance, and risk appraisal) were analyzed. Results: No significant differences were found in ACL-RSI scores pre- to post return to sport testing (-2.27, p=0.125). However, there was a significant decrease in the emotions subscale (-5.08, p=0.006), suggesting that physical testing may negatively impact emotional readiness. The confidence in performance and risk appraisal subscales did not show significant changes. Despite no statistical differences in ACL-RSI scores pre- to post return to sport testing, 20% of participants exhibited a change in ACL-RSI scores that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), highlighting individual variability in psychological responses to testing. Conclusion: The findings suggest that administering the ACL-RSI after physical performance testing may provide a more accurate assessment of some athletes' psychological readiness to return to sport. The significant reduction in the emotions subscale underscores the need for further research into the emotional impact of physical testing. Level of Evidence: 3b.

Indexed as

ACL-RSIanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionpsychological readinessreturn to sport testing

Identifiers

PMID40469648
PMCPMC12129634

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.