ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Development of the Ajinomoto Group Nutrient Profiling System for Japanese Meals.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a nutrient profiling scoring system for Thai meals: a prototype for healthier meal choices in Thailand.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- The Ajinomoto group nutrient profiling system for Japanese dishes and meals.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Application of a Food-Based Nutritional Profiling System to Assess Diet Quality in Diet-Level Data: Evidence on Construct and Convergent Validity from the Hatoyama Cohort Study and Kusatsu Cohort Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nutrient profiling (NP) is a method used to classify or score foods based on their nutritional content and impact on human health. The Ajinomoto Group Nutrient Profiling System (ANPS) was previously developed to evaluate the nutritional value of cooked dishes consumed in Japan. This study aimed to develop a novel NP model, named the Ajinomoto Group Nutrient Profiling System for Japanese Meals (ANPS-Meal), to evaluate meals. Methods: The ANPS-Meal evaluates meals using essential components based on public health concerns specific to Japan. The scoring algorithm includes protein and vegetables for encouraged intake and saturated fatty acids and sodium for limited intake. The convergent validity of this model was verified by comparison with the metric Healthy Eating Index-2015 (mHEI-2015) and the Nutrient-Rich Food Index 9.3 (NRF9.3). Results: A total of 1,816 meals commonly consumed in Japan were evaluated using the ANPS-Meal. The average ANPS-Meal score was 73.7 (standard deviation = 15.5), with a median of 75 (interquartile range = 62.5-85) and a range of 27.5-100. High-scoring meals featured low sodium and high vegetables. The higher quartiles of the ANPS-Meal were associated with higher carbohydrate, dietary fiber, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and vitamins A, D, and C, as well as lower fat content. Spearman's correlation coefficients were Discussion: The newly developed ANPS-Meal can be used for evaluating the overall nutritional value of a wide variety of meals based on four components: protein, vegetables, saturated fatty acids, and sodium. This model provides a comprehensive tool for assessing meal quality in alignment with public health objectives specific to Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.