ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025
Setting Expectations When Prescribing Medication for the Treatment of Patients With Obesity.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treating Severe Obesity: A Medical Perspective.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Identifying Predictors of Weight-Related Outcomes With Fixed-Dose, Extended-Release Naltrexone and Bupropion Among Treatment-Adherent Patients in Phase 3 COR Trials: A Treatment Target Analysis.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The worldwide prevalence of obesity more than doubled between 1990 and 2022 (men, 4.8%-14.0%; women, 8.8%-18.5%), with similar trends observed for obesity-related diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite this increase in prevalence, many individuals with obesity remain untreated. There are several barriers limiting access to effective care, including the stigma and bias associated with obesity and lack of insurance coverage as a standard job benefit. Additionally, unrealistic expectations for rate of weight-loss and the weight-loss process as well as a lack of proper education on the weight-loss journey and treatment options can contribute to the inability to achieve weight-loss goals and a reluctance to try evidence-based approaches. Therefore, there is a need for effective management and education focusing on individualized treatment and setting viable expectations for the treatment of patients with obesity. Health care providers should compassionately discuss with their patients the importance of weight-loss, the long-term clinical benefits, and expectations for the weight-loss journey, including amount and timing of weight-loss, as well as the potential financial implications associated with obesity treatment. Health care providers should also be able to inform patients along the treatment journey, including about potential adverse events and how they can be managed. Importantly, treatments and decisions should be tailored to each patient using shared decision making with a focus on their characteristics, history, and goals. In this study, the expectations and current use of approved antiobesity medications in the United States are reviewed.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.