Evidence mapPaperPMID 40469756Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025

Setting Expectations When Prescribing Medication for the Treatment of Patients With Obesity.

Angela Fitch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Angela Fitchknownwell, Needham, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide prevalence of obesity more than doubled between 1990 and 2022 (men, 4.8%-14.0%; women, 8.8%-18.5%), with similar trends observed for obesity-related diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite this increase in prevalence, many individuals with obesity remain untreated. There are several barriers limiting access to effective care, including the stigma and bias associated with obesity and lack of insurance coverage as a standard job benefit. Additionally, unrealistic expectations for rate of weight-loss and the weight-loss process as well as a lack of proper education on the weight-loss journey and treatment options can contribute to the inability to achieve weight-loss goals and a reluctance to try evidence-based approaches. Therefore, there is a need for effective management and education focusing on individualized treatment and setting viable expectations for the treatment of patients with obesity. Health care providers should compassionately discuss with their patients the importance of weight-loss, the long-term clinical benefits, and expectations for the weight-loss journey, including amount and timing of weight-loss, as well as the potential financial implications associated with obesity treatment. Health care providers should also be able to inform patients along the treatment journey, including about potential adverse events and how they can be managed. Importantly, treatments and decisions should be tailored to each patient using shared decision making with a focus on their characteristics, history, and goals. In this study, the expectations and current use of approved antiobesity medications in the United States are reviewed.

Identifiers

PMID40469756
PMCPMC12136820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.