ArticleDigital health
Patient and clinician opinions on internet search data use in therapy: Insights, considerations, and guidelines for integrating a new digital phenotyping measure.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The integration of technology in mental health care has proliferated to address accessibility and symptom monitoring through smartphones and apps. While the analysis of internet search data has proved fruitful in predicting various outcomes like youth suicidality and psychosis relapse, there has been scant research assessing opinions of patients and clinicians on adopting it in outpatient care, and no work on assessing the perceived utility of visualized data. We sought to address this gap by evaluating (1) the comfort, feasibility, and utility of sharing internet search data, and (2) various data visualizations from a novel pipeline to inform how patients and clinicians might start its potential integration immediately. Methods: Patients ( Results: We revealed three common themes: varying comfort with internet search data in therapy, benefits of internet search data in therapy, and risks of internet search data in therapy. Patients and clinicians were generally comfortable integrating internet search data into therapy, but expressed reservations regarding data privacy and security, liability and complete patient autonomy. More granular search data in visualizations was considered more useful when compared to vague search frequencies. Conclusion: Our results reveal a spectrum of comfort and utility surrounding integrating internet search data in therapy. We introduce a simple data processing pipeline for dynamic visualizations of search data at a variety of comfort levels, laying the immediate groundwork for its personalized implementation in outpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.