ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Sagittal Skeletal Relationship and Craniocervical Posture in Peruvian Children.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tooth misalignment and malposition are common oral health problems. It is important to evaluate the factors associated with malocclusion in order to observe the behavior of the occlusion. Objective: To determine the association between sagittal skeletal relationship (SR) and craniocervical posture (CP). Materials and methods: This retrospective study evaluated 187 digital lateral radiographs of Peruvian children and the C0-C1 (suboccipital space) and (90 males and 97 females) aged 6-12 years (mean age: 10.16 ± 1.54 years). Sagittal SR included the ANB angle according to Steiner analysis and the anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) angle (indicator of anteroposterior dysplasia) according to Kim analysis in class I (ANB 0-4°, APDI 78-84°), class II (ANB >4°, APDI <78°), and class III (ANB <0°, APDI >84°). CP was assessed with Rocabado analysis according to the MGP-OP angle (craniocervical rotation) and the CO-C1 (suboccipital space) and H (position of the hyoid bone) distances. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman correlation, and Pearson's Results: A very low to low significant correlation was found between ANB with MGP-OP (rho = -0.195) and CO-C1 (rho = 0.173) and H (rho = 0.173) and H (rho = 0.164) and between APDI with MGP-OP (rho = 0.176) and H (rho = -0.161) ( Conclusion: CP was associated with the sagittal SR, showing an extended posture in class II compared to other skeletal classes. Clinical significance: Cephalometric study of CP should be performed at early ages to determine the skeletal class associated with an unfavorable inclination. How to cite this article: Salazar-Lara SE, Carranza-Samanez KM, Dulanto-Vargas JA. Sagittal Skeletal Relationship and Craniocervical Posture in Peruvian Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(4):368-374.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.