Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470470›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Federated prediction for scalable and privacy-preserved knowledge-based planning in radiotherapy.

Jingyun Chen, David Horowitz, Yading Yuan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingyun ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
David HorowitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yading YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

MSHS Translational Science HubUL1TR001433 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WRIGHT, ROSALIND J · 2015 to 2019
$26.6M
A Fully Decentralized Federated Learning Framework for Automated Image Segmentation in Cancer RadiotherapyR21EB030209 · NIBIB · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI YUAN, YADING · 2021 to 2021
$653k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001433NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep learning has potential to improve the efficiency and consistency of radiation therapy planning, but clinical adoption is hindered by the limited model generalizability due to data scarcity and heterogeneity among institutions. Although aggregating data from different institutions could alleviate this problem, data sharing is a practical challenge due to concerns about patient data privacy and other technical obstacles. Purpose: This work aims to address this dilemma by developing FedKBP+, a comprehensive federated learning (FL) platform for predictive tasks in real-world applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. Methods: We implemented a unified communication stack based on Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC) to support communication between participants whether located on the same workstation or distributed across multiple workstations. In addition to supporting the centralized FL strategies commonly available in existing open-source frameworks, FedKBP+ also provides a fully decentralized FL model where participants directly exchange model weights to each other through Peer-to-Peer communication. We evaluated FedKBP+ on three predictive tasks using scale-attention network (SA-Net) as the predictive model. Results: Using 340 cases (training: 200; validation: 40; testing: 100) from the OpenKBP Challenge, a 3D dose prediction model trained with FedAvg algorithm outperformed the model trained on the local data, and achieved predictive accuracy comparable to that of a centrally trained model using pooled data in both independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID settings. We further evaluated the performance of FedKBP+ against NVFlare on the task of brain tumor segmentation using 227 cases from eight sites in the 2021 BraTS challenge dataset (training: 152; validation: 27; testing: 48). FedKBP+ surpassed the NVFlare framework in both accuracy and training efficiency. FedAvg with FedKBP+ achieved a DSC of 92.38% in 5.92 hours versus NVFlare's 90.75% in 7.78 hours; FedProx with FedKBP+ reached 91.98% in 6.03 hours against NVFlare's 90.37% in 7.80 hours. Finally, in a robustness study of FedKBP+ for organ segmentation using 384 cases from five sites in the PanSeg dataset (training: 269; validation: 39; testing: 76), Gossip Contrastive Mutual Learning - a novel decentralized FL algorithm - demonstrated strong resilience to site failure without significant accuracy loss even when up to 40% of sites randomly dropped out at each round of federated training ( Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that FedKBP+ is highly effective, efficient and robust, showing great potential as a federated learning platform for radiation therapy.

Indexed as

dose predictionfederated learningknowledge-based planningorgan segmentationtumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40470470
PMCPMC12136487

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.