ReviewPlanta2025
A review on modeling approaches for the transcriptional regulatory network intricacies of circadian clock genes in plants.
Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThis review highlights the diverse modeling approaches essential for understanding the dynamics of plant circadian clock genes, which are key to optimizing plant growth, development, and resilience to environmental stress. The circadian clock in plants is a complex system governed by intricate transcriptional regulatory networks that orchestrate gene expression in response to environmental cues. These networks are crucial for understanding plant adaptation to daily changes and optimizing growth. This review provides a comprehensive account of various modeling approaches used to study plants' transcriptional regulatory network of circadian clock genes. Here, we review different computational methodologies like ordinary differential equation-based approaches, stochastic models, and spatial techniques that can be evaluated on their ability to capture the dynamics, variability, and interactions inherent to the circadian clock system. Moreover, the circadian clock's responsiveness to environmental cues, such as light, temperature, and other stressors plays a pivotal role in ensuring plant development. The modeling approaches must consider environmental factors influencing the transcriptional regulatory networks, which potentially alter the clock's phase, amplitude, and photoperiod. These adaptations are critical for plant survival, as they align physiological processes with specific hours of the day, enhancing resource use efficiency, and stress resilience. We highlight the respective strengths and limitations of different models emphasizing the importance of an integrative approach that combines multiple techniques which capture the essence of interactions of circadian clock components and their implications for plant growth, development and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40471439What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.