ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2025
Giving as repaying: towards an embodied ethics of living donor liver transplantation.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article explores the lived experiences and ethical complexities of the decision- and meaning-making journey involved in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) through a case study of a young adult who donated part of his liver to his father. Utilising embodied phenomenology and narrative analysis, we present an in-depth exploration of personal stories and interconnected narratives that reveal the intricate layers and nuances inherent in child-to-parent LDLT within the Taiwanese sociocultural milieu. This study examines the embodied, relational, temporal and normative dimensions through a dynamic, iterative process of careful reading and analysis, from which four plotlines emerged [(1) indebtedness, (2) thrownness, (3) struggle for selfhood and (4) family seniority] along with a postscript. The findings illuminate the complex interplay of body, self, family, intergenerational dynamics and sociocultural norms throughout the decision-making process. The analysis aims to lay the groundwork for a refined framework for understanding concepts such as giving, relationality, agency, temporality and normativity within bioethical discourses on organ transplantation. Furthermore, the study offers insights for healthcare professionals to develop culturally sensitive approaches in LDLT care ethics and practice, with particular attention to vulnerability, relational autonomy and embodied intersubjectivity as normative foundations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.