ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025
Media coverage of contaminants in pilot whales in the Faroe Islands.
Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Awareness, cultural importance, risk perception and consumption behavior - the issue of contaminants in pilot whales in the Faroe Islands.International journal of circumpolar health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the portrayal of contaminants in pilot whale in Faroese media from 1977 to 2022. Pilot whale is integral to Faroese culture but has come under scrutiny due to health concerns linked to contaminants. Given the role of media in shaping public understanding of health risks, our research assesses how four main Faroese media outlets have presented the issue to the public. We analysed 227 newspaper articles, radio, and television news stories, focusing on contaminants, mentioning of scientific studies or researchers, the demographic groups identified as at risk, and mentions of government advisories on whale meat consumption. Our findings indicate a predominant portrayal of contaminants as harmful, with a substantial emphasis on the risks to developing foetuses and children. Scientific studies, particularly those led by the Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health in the Faroe Islands, were frequently cited. Despite varying advisories over the years, the narrative consistently highlighted the health risks associated with pilot whale consumption. This study contributes to broader discussions on environmental health communication by illustrating how localised media coverage can shape public risk perception, offering insights relevant to communities facing similar dilemmas between traditional hunting and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.