ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic and static analysis of environmental variables in coronavirus spread.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although a worldwide health crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic affected several geographical areas in Italy in very different ways in terms of infection rate, morbidity, and death. In the present work, we carefully studied the incidence rate in several Italian provinces and propose a complete data analysis strategy to explore, preprocess, and analyse the time series of COVID-19 positive and hospitalised cases with a daily cadency. We applied a new procedure, developed for unevenly sampled data (Discrete Correlation Function), to perform the cross-correlation analysis looking at possible correlation between COVID-19 positive and hospitalised cases with the air quality during the first pandemic wave. It is a completely new approach, that makes use of techniques used in transversal fields, such as signal processing and astronomy. The study suggests some plausible correlations between COVID-19 time series and NO related air pollutants. Instead, differently from what often has been reported, we did not find any specific correlation between COVID-19 infection and PM[Formula: see text] air pollutant. We further corroborate the results using a Machine Learning approach that uses Random Forest and the Permutation Feature Importance Analysis to include a wider set of possible risk factors, founding the same dependence between COVID-19 cases and NO related air pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.