ReviewPharmaceutical research2025
The Finite Absorption Time Concept Guiding Model Informed Drug & Generics Development in Clinical Pharmacology.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo show the implications of the incorporation of the Finite Absorption Time (F.A.T.) concept in drug development plans and in generics development and assessment and to examine regulatory implications.
methodsReexamining and reanalyzing published pharmacokinetic data using the pertinent models that are based on F.A.T.
resultsComparing absorption metrics, old and new ones, shows distinct advantages and better accuracy for those based on the F.A.T. CONCEPT:
conclusionThe proposed approaches can be applied successfully in all phases of drug/generics development and guide changes in their strategy and in the relevant regulatory framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.