Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474104›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Implant-free loop tenodesis compared to arthroscopic anchor tenodesis for the treatment of long head of biceps tendon disorders (LOOPTEN trial): study protocol for a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Leopold Henssler, Florian Zeman, Doruk Akgün, Kathi Thiele, Stephan Pauly, Stefan Greiner, Andreas Voss, Christian Gerhardt, Lars-Johannes Lehmann, Gunnar Huppertz and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Leopold HensslerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany. Leopold.henssler@ukr.de.
Florian ZemanCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Doruk AkgünCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Mittelallee 3, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Kathi ThieleCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Mittelallee 3, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Stephan PaulyDepartment for Shoulder Surgery, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Clinic, Rubensstraße 125, Berlin, 12157, Germany.
Stefan GreinerSporthopaedicum Regensburg, Straubinger Str. 30, Regensburg, 93055, Germany.
Andreas VossSporthopaedicum Regensburg, Straubinger Str. 30, Regensburg, 93055, Germany.
Christian GerhardtDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Hand Surgery and Sports Medicine, ViDia Clinic Karlsruhe, Steinhäuserstraße 18, Karlsruhe, 76135, Germany.
Lars-Johannes LehmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Hand Surgery and Sports Medicine, ViDia Clinic Karlsruhe, Steinhäuserstraße 18, Karlsruhe, 76135, Germany.
Gunnar HuppertzCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Magdalena ElsnerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Volker AltDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Michael KollerCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Maximilian KerschbaumDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KG2404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are frequently seen as concomitant pathologies during arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff injuries or the labroligamentous complex of the shoulder. Currently, there are two treatment options: Tenotomy is quick and easy to perform with low complications rates, but has limited functional results, especially in demanding patients; tenodesis of the tendon has shown beneficial cosmetic and functional results, but usually requires an implant for tendon-to-bone attachment and, therefore, carries the risk of implant-related complications. The implant-free loop tenodesis (LT) procedure was developed to combine the advantages of both treatment modalities and has shown promising functional and cosmetic results in a prospective pilot study. This study aims to establish the implant-free LT procedure versus arthroscopic anchor tenodesis (AAT) for the treatment of LHB pathologies during shoulder arthroscopy in terms of structural and functional outcome.

methodsA national multi-center, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial will be conducted. Patients are eligible for trial participation if they are at least 18 years of age and present to one of the five enrolling centers with LHB tendon-associated complaints and MRI-confirmed LHB tendinopathy, instability due to SLAP or pulley lesions, or partial rupture. Patients with current or previous shoulder injury that would interfere with post-treatment rehabilitation or study assessment will be excluded from study participation. Participating patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either LT or AAT and will be followed up for 24 months after surgery. The primary endpoint will be the functional and cosmetic outcome as assessed by the biceps-specific LHB score at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include assessment of surgery-related complications, overall shoulder and arm function, and structural outcome as evaluated by ultrasound and an additional MRI scan at the final study visit. DISCUSSION: The study will evaluate whether the implant-free loop tenodesis procedure is non-inferior to arthroscopic implant-based tenodesis in terms of functional and cosmetic results at 12 months post-treatment.

trial registrationTrial was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 12

Indexed as

ArthroscopySuture AnchorsTendinopathyTenodesisAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointTendonsArthroscopyBicepsLabrumRotator cuffShoulderTendonTenodesisTenotomy

Identifiers

PMID40474104
PMCPMC12142869

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.