ArticleBioData mining2025
subMG automates data submission for metagenomics studies.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPublicly available metagenomics datasets are crucial for ensuring the reproducibility of scientific findings and supporting contemporary large-scale studies. However, submitting a comprehensive metagenomics dataset is both cumbersome and time-consuming. It requires including sample information, sequencing reads, assemblies, binned contigs, metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), and appropriate metadata. As a result, metagenomics studies are often published with incomplete datasets or, in some cases, without any data at all. subMG addresses this challenge by simplifying and automating the data submission process, thereby encouraging broader and more consistent data sharing.
resultssubMG streamlines the process of submitting metagenomics study results to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) by allowing researchers to input files and metadata from their studies in a single form and automating downstream tasks that otherwise require extensive manual effort and expertise. The tool comes with comprehensive documentation as well as example data tailored for different use cases and can be operated via the command-line or a graphical user interface (GUI), making it easily deployable to a wide range of potential users.
conclusionsBy simplifying the submission of genome-resolved metagenomics study datasets, subMG significantly reduces the time, effort, and expertise required from researchers, thus paving the way for more numerous and comprehensive data submissions in the future. An increased availability of well-documented and FAIR data can benefit future research, particularly in meta-analyses and comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.