ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Prevalence and predictors of breastfeeding practices in Saudi Arabia: a national cross-sectional study based on the 2021 WHO breastfeeding indicators.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel determinants of early childhood health during the first 1,000 days in Saudi Arabia: a scoping review with implications for nursing practice and policy.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Nurturing the Will: Unraveling Associative Factors of Exclusive Breastfeeding Intentions Among Primigravida in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreastfeeding is described as a cost-effective strategy to improve child survival, growth and development, and reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases later in life. This study aims to provide national estimates for the six breastfeeding indicators set by the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund (WHO/UNICEF) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and identify factors associated with inadequate breastfeeding practices in the country.
methodsA national cross-sectional survey was conducted in KSA's five regions between May and December 2023. Birth registry data were used to randomly select the study sample (n = 9242) Infant and Young Children (IYC) below 24 months of age. Data was collected via phone-based interviews with mothers as main respondents. The 24-h recall approach was used to collect information about the current infant feeding practices.
resultsResults showed that the prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding for the first two days (EBF2D) were 43.4% and 31.3%, respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) under six months and mixed milk feeding (MixMF) were reported by 15.5% and 34.9% of mothers, respectively. Only 5.8% of infants aged 5-5.9 months were exclusively breastfed. The prevalence of continued breastfeeding (CBF) in the total sample of mothers was 19.6% and that of ever breastfeeding (EvBF) was 89.3%. Based on multiple logistic regression analyses, lower odds of meeting the breastfeeding indicators were noted amongst IYC of Saudi nationality, first-borns, or those born prematurely or by Cesarean section. Maternal employment/student status was associated with higher odds of MixMF.
conclusionsThis study provided national estimates for the breastfeeding indicators that may serve as a baseline for future surveys, and identified population groups that are at higher risk of inadequate breastfeeding practices. The findings should guide the development of culturally appropriate interventions aimed at protecting, promoting and supporting EIBF and EBF in the hospital, after discharge and during six months after birth, and to raise awareness around the importance of CBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.