ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025
Lessons and challenges of practice of traditional medicines as an alternative for COVID-19 vaccine in Tanzania.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought a peculiar experience across the world as populations were engulfed in shocks and panic because of lack of substantive interventions during its early days. Different intervention options were tested, including traditional medicines. Despite the lack of scientific evidence on safety and efficacy, traditional medicines brought calmness and dispelled fear associated with the disease in Tanzania. On the other hand, the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines was met by hesitancy, rumours and doubts about its safety and efficacy. Aim: This study aimed at understanding how promotion of traditional medicines during the early days of the pandemic affected timely introduction and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. Settings: The study was conducted in a mix of urban and rural districts, purposively sampled from eight zones of the country. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which employed the qualitative methods including key informant interviews and focus group discussions in eight zones of Tanzania. Results: Political advocacy on the use of traditional medicines in treating COVID-19 received a massive response across the country. This was driven by a lack of modern medicines during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. The introduction and promotion of COVID-19 vaccines in Tanzania provides a learning experience for future epidemics. Conclusion: Political advocacy influenced public leaning towards traditional medicines, while creating hesitancy on COVID-19 vaccines in Tanzania. This experience emphasises on using scientific evidence to promote interventions during health emergencies. Contribution: Research on traditional medicines focusing on infectious diseases outbreaks is emphasised to generate evidence which will guide advocacy on its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.