SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Association between sensitization to common fungi and severe asthma.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aspergillosis: An Update on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Susceptibility, and Treatment.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innate airway immune response to fungal allergens.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The term severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) has been coined due to the non-negligible role of fungal sensitization in the development of asthma. These patients typically exhibit poorer lung function, worse clinical prognosis, and a significantly elevated risk of life-threatening asthma exacerbations. Methods: We conducted electronic searches in three databases as of October 31, 2024. Two evaluators independently screened titles and abstracts to identify studies for full-text review. For studies meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, the investigators used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of cross-sectional studies and a case-control study, respectively, followed by data extraction from included studies. Results: Among the 10 fungal genera examined, sensitization to Conclusion: In this study, we quantified the risk of sensitization to distinct fungal genera/species, aiming to provide a scientific rationale for screening high-risk fungal sensitization, early detection of severe asthma risk, and personalized health management for patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier [CRD42024620737].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.