ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025
Quality Measure Adherence in Parkinson's Disease: A Single Center Experience***Parkinson's Disease Quality Measures.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Small Strokes, Big Impact: Excessive Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PWPs) often have both motor and non-motor manifestations requiring specialized care. Neurologists typically lead their care; however, the population of PWPs is exceeding the supply of neurologists. Primary care providers (PCPs) may need to contribute to improve care. Objective: To measure American Academy of Neurology quality metric (QM) adherence between neurologists and PCPs for PWPs. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective, descriptive analysis assessing 14 QMs in the past year for PWPs established with a neurologist and PCP. McNemar's test assessed statistical differences between groups. Logistic regression models explored the impact of age, sex, and visit frequency on QM adherence. Results: On average, 8.9 QMs were addressed among 89 PWPs. Motor complications, rehabilitation referrals, falls, and autonomic dysfunction were the most often addressed while apathy and impulse control disorder were the least. Neurologists alone met motor complications, psychosis, impulse control disorder, and sleep disturbance significantly more than PCPs alone while PCPs assessed depression and advance care planning more often. PCP involvement improved adherence throughout. Depression, apathy, and advance care planning metric adherence were significantly impacted by age and/or visit frequency. Conclusions: A team-based approach to quality metric adherence may reduce the burden on providers and improve care for PWPs.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.