Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475470›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Comparison of QuPath and HALO platforms for analysis of the tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer.

Wei Zhang, Qin Zhou, Jonathan V Nguyen, Erika Egal, Qian Yang, Michael R Freeman, Siwen Hu-Lieskovan, Gita Suneja, Anna Coghill, Beatrice S Knudsen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wei Zhang
Qin Zhou
Jonathan V Nguyen
Erika Egal
Qian Yang
Michael R Freeman
Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
Gita Suneja
Anna Coghill
Beatrice S Knudsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

QuPath, an open-source digital pathology platform, has gained widespread use for image analysis in biomedical research since its release in 2016. However, its reproducibility and reliability compared to commercial software, such as HALO, requires further validation, particularly for multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) analysis. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of QuPath and HALO using a mIF-stained prostate cancer tissue microarray (TMA) inclusive of 192 unique cores. We evaluated performance across three key analytical modules: immune cell phenotyping, tumor infiltration with immune cells, and nearest neighbor analysis. Furthermore, we integrated QuPath with CytoMap, an open-source spatial analysis tool, to perform unsupervised clustering of immune cell infiltration-a feature not available in HALO. Our results demonstrated high concordance between two platforms, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.89 for immune cell density, distance and pattern of cell organization in tumor microenvironment (TME). A neighborhood analysis using CytoMap was further performed and provided a more detailed spatial analysis of immune cell distribution across different prostate cancer grades. A significant increase of CD103+ T cell infiltration into TME was observed in prostate cancer, which might be associated with the expression level of its ligand (E-cadherin) in the tumor region. In conclusion, our findings validate QuPath as a robust and reproducible alternative to commercial platforms for fluorescence-based digital pathology. By demonstrating QuPath's capability to perform high-quality quantitative analysis with additional flexibility for integration with external tools, our study underscores its potential for advancing tumor microenvironment research in translational oncology.

Identifiers

PMID40475470
PMCPMC12139998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.