ArticleHealth services insights2025
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The complexity of treatment pathways and the chronic nature of diseases in vascular surgery necessitate a patient-centred approach to improve care quality and health outcomes. Objectives: To explore vascular patients' experiences, identifying key factors influencing their satisfaction and adherence to treatment. Study Design: Qualitative design using thematic analysis. Methods: Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with vascular patients (10 males and 7 females) from 3 vascular units in Wales. Proportional random sampling was used for participant selection based on recent vascular care, age, sex, and clinical backgrounds. Interviews were conducted in person, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes. NVivo 10 software facilitated data management. Results: Six themes were identified: (i) communication and information delivery, (ii) patient involvement in decision-making, (iii) pain management, (iv) psychological and emotional support, (v) healthcare environment and systemic processes and (vi) continuity of care and post-discharge experience. While patients generally appreciated the professionalism of the healthcare staff, notable disparities emerged in communication, particularly for patients with lower health literacy or during waiting periods. Inconsistencies in discharge planning and follow-up care highlighted systemic inequities. Across all units, patients reported a lack of formal psychological support. Involvement in decision-making varied, with some patients feeling adequately included, while others experienced exclusion and anxiety. Conclusion: These findings reveal key areas for improvement, with communication serving as a foundational element that enhances patient involvement in decision-making, psychological support, and continuity of care. Addressing these interconnected areas, with a focus on effective communication and health equity, may help close care gaps and improve outcomes for all vascular patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.