ArticleJournal of liver transplantation2025
The role of recipient sex in the post-liver transplant prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Article in Journal of liver transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background & aims: Limited data exists on the impact of recipient sex on the post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This study aims to utilize a national transplant registry to evaluate the relationship between recipient sex and post-transplant outcomes, stratified by ACLF severity. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (UNOS-STAR) database was queried to collect health information on 47,447 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1987 and 2019. The cohort was stratified by biological sex, and further subdivided into groups based on ACLF severity: Grade 0 (without ACLF) and Grade 1-3 in increasing severity. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and graft failure while secondary outcomes included specific causes of death. Results: No sex-based disparities were observed in the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and graft failure across all grades of ACLF. However, females without ACLF exhibited a higher risk of mortality from recurrent graft disease compared to males. Time-point analyses revealed higher 180-day and 360-day mortality rates in females without ACLF. Among patients with ACLF Grade 1, females demonstrated higher 30-day mortality, but no significant differences were found at 90-, 180- or 360-days. Among patients with ACLF Grades 2 and 3, however, no sex-based differences in 30-day to 360-day mortality were identified. Conclusion: Factors other than sex appear to play a more critical role in determining the long-term transplant outcomes in ACLF. The increased short-term mortality observed in females with ACLF grade 1 warrants further investigation to elucidate potential contributing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.