Evidence mapPaperPMID 40475709Full record

ArticleJournal of liver transplantation2025

The role of recipient sex in the post-liver transplant prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure.

David Uihwan Lee, Mohammed Rifat Shaik, Sharmitha Yerneni, Ashton Harmacinski, Nishat Anjum Shaik, Katie Evey, Kuntal Bhowmick, Zainab Mujahid, Youngjae Cha, Hannah Chou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of liver transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David Uihwan LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Mohammed Rifat ShaikDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Sharmitha YerneniLiver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Ashton HarmacinskiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Nishat Anjum ShaikDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Katie EveyLiver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Kuntal BhowmickRoger L Jenkins Transplant Institute, Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Diseases, Lahey Hospital Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, USA.
Zainab MujahidDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Youngjae ChaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Hannah ChouLiver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Andrew YiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland, 620 W Lexington St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3422-0796
Kijung LeeLiver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Gregory Hongyuan FanLiver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8477-7586
Raza MalikRoger L Jenkins Transplant Institute, Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Diseases, Lahey Hospital Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, USA.

Funding

Research Training in GastroenterologyT32DK067872 · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · 2005 to 2005
$144k
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK067872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aims: Limited data exists on the impact of recipient sex on the post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This study aims to utilize a national transplant registry to evaluate the relationship between recipient sex and post-transplant outcomes, stratified by ACLF severity. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (UNOS-STAR) database was queried to collect health information on 47,447 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1987 and 2019. The cohort was stratified by biological sex, and further subdivided into groups based on ACLF severity: Grade 0 (without ACLF) and Grade 1-3 in increasing severity. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and graft failure while secondary outcomes included specific causes of death. Results: No sex-based disparities were observed in the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and graft failure across all grades of ACLF. However, females without ACLF exhibited a higher risk of mortality from recurrent graft disease compared to males. Time-point analyses revealed higher 180-day and 360-day mortality rates in females without ACLF. Among patients with ACLF Grade 1, females demonstrated higher 30-day mortality, but no significant differences were found at 90-, 180- or 360-days. Among patients with ACLF Grades 2 and 3, however, no sex-based differences in 30-day to 360-day mortality were identified. Conclusion: Factors other than sex appear to play a more critical role in determining the long-term transplant outcomes in ACLF. The increased short-term mortality observed in females with ACLF grade 1 warrants further investigation to elucidate potential contributing factors.

Indexed as

ACLFAll-cause mortalityLiver transplantationRecipient sexSex disparitiesSpecific causes of deathUNOS-STAR

Identifiers

PMID40475709
PMCPMC12140565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.