Evidence mapPaperPMID 40475728Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Optimization of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring during Pregnancy: A Path Toward Risk Stratification Improvement and Management of Hypertensive Disorders.

Yiwen Fang, Lushu Zuo, Jingge Li, Huihua Shi, Ruimin Zhang, Cha Han, Lijuan Lv, Xin Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Response to "further optimization of morning blood pressure assessment in high-risk pregnancy".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  2. Response to "Comment on 'Morning blood pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk pregnancies'".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Morning Blood Pressure and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiwen FangDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Lushu ZuoDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Jingge LiDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Huihua ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Ruimin ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Cha HanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.
Lijuan LvMedical Genetic Center and Department of Obstetrics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, 511442 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 300052 Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-7103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) pose substantial risks to both maternal and fetal health, thereby highlighting the need for precise and comprehensive blood pressure (BP) monitoring methods. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers advantages over traditional office BP measurements by enabling continuous 24-hour assessment, thus capturing circadian BP variations, including nocturnal and morning hypertension, which are often missed when BP is measured in a medical office. This capacity for detailed monitoring allows ABPM to identify specific BP phenotypes, such as normotension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension. Each of these phenotypes has unique implications for risk stratification, which helps to identify high-risk pregnancies early and potentially improve outcomes through more targeted interventions. Despite these advantages, three key challenges have limited the widespread adoption of ABPM during pregnancy. First, the complex dynamics in BP variations throughout gestation are influenced by physiological adaptations, such as uterine artery remodeling, which lowers BP before 20 weeks and increases mean arterial pressure after 20 weeks to support fetal growth. Second, adaptive changes in the maternal arterial system alter vascular mechanical properties, complicating accurate BP assessments. Third, diagnostic thresholds specific to pregnancy that are directly linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes are lacking. Therefore, this review addresses the role of ABPM in managing HDP, examining BP dynamics and the suitability of monitoring devices, and ongoing efforts to develop diagnostic thresholds tailored to pregnancy. By exploring these aspects, this review underscores the importance of ABPM in advancing more precise, effective strategies for HDP management and multidisciplinary management programs for pregnant women to enhance clinical decision-making and maternal-fetal outcomes.

Indexed as

ambulatory blood pressurediagnosispregnancyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40475728
PMCPMC12135640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.