ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Specificity and Areas of Usage of Cardiovascular Prediction Models Among Athletes-State-of-the-art Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Athletes - State-of-the-Art Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Physical activity is linked with a reduced prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. However, excessive over-volume of training could negatively increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Prediction models are usually derived to facilitate decision-making and may be used to precisely adjust the intensity of physical activity and stratify individual exercise capacity. Incorporating prediction models and knowledge of risk factors of cardiovascular diseases allows for the accurate determination of risk groups among athletes. Due to the growing popularity of amateur physical activity, as well as the high demands for professional athletes, taking care of their health and providing precise pre-participation recommendations, return-to-play guidelines or training intensity is a significant challenge for physicians and fitness practitioners. Athletes with confirmed or suspected cardiovascular disease should be guided to perform training in carefully adjusted safe zones. Indirect prediction algorithms are feasible and easy-to-apply methods of individual cardiovascular disease risk estimation. Current knowledge about the usage of clinical forecasting scores among athletic cohorts is limited and numerous controversies emerged. The purpose of this review is to summarize the practical applications of the most common prediction models for maximal oxygen uptake, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and cardiomyopathies among athletes. We primarily focused on endurance disciplines with additional insight into strength training. The secondary aim was to discuss their relationships in the context of the clinical management of athletes and highlights key understudied areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.