Evidence mapPaperPMID 40475739Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Specificity and Areas of Usage of Cardiovascular Prediction Models Among Athletes-State-of-the-art Review.

Tomasz Chomiuk, Przemysław Kasiak, Artur Mamcarz, Daniel Śliż

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomasz Chomiuk3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-327X
Przemysław Kasiak3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0303-6135
Artur Mamcarz3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-1486
Daniel Śliż3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-8119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Physical activity is linked with a reduced prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. However, excessive over-volume of training could negatively increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Prediction models are usually derived to facilitate decision-making and may be used to precisely adjust the intensity of physical activity and stratify individual exercise capacity. Incorporating prediction models and knowledge of risk factors of cardiovascular diseases allows for the accurate determination of risk groups among athletes. Due to the growing popularity of amateur physical activity, as well as the high demands for professional athletes, taking care of their health and providing precise pre-participation recommendations, return-to-play guidelines or training intensity is a significant challenge for physicians and fitness practitioners. Athletes with confirmed or suspected cardiovascular disease should be guided to perform training in carefully adjusted safe zones. Indirect prediction algorithms are feasible and easy-to-apply methods of individual cardiovascular disease risk estimation. Current knowledge about the usage of clinical forecasting scores among athletic cohorts is limited and numerous controversies emerged. The purpose of this review is to summarize the practical applications of the most common prediction models for maximal oxygen uptake, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and cardiomyopathies among athletes. We primarily focused on endurance disciplines with additional insight into strength training. The secondary aim was to discuss their relationships in the context of the clinical management of athletes and highlights key understudied areas for future research.

Indexed as

athletecardiovascular diseasesphysical activityprediction modeltraining

Identifiers

PMID40475739
PMCPMC12135649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.