ReviewTherapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine
Biomarkers in Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incremental Value of Adding S100B to NSE for High-Specificity Rule-in of Poor Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Serial lactate-procalcitonin interaction identifies a high-risk phenotype in 24-h conditional survivors of post-cardiac arrest syndrome: a CART-based analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory, neurologic, and cardiac biomarkers appear to have varying significance in the prognostication of patients with cardiac arrest. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome is a condition characterized by systemic ischemia with reperfusion injury, neurologic damage, and myocardial dysfunction. The relative significance of these biomarkers remains unclear and is an area of active investigation. In this narrative review, we aim to describe what is currently known about the role of inflammatory, neurologic, and cardiac biomarkers in cardiac arrest. A PubMed review was performed for relevant articles. Articles that studied inflammatory, neurologic, and cardiac biomarkers in adult cardiac arrest were included. This narrative review determined that biomarkers play a key role in facilitating prognostication of patients with cardiac arrest. The release of inflammatory, neurologic, and cardiac biomarkers mediates inflammation, ischemic brain injury, and myocardial dysfunction. Inflammatory and neurologic biomarkers appear to have more clinical utility than cardiac biomarkers. When combined with physical exam, imaging and electroencephalograph findings, blood biomarkers can be useful in making predictions of patient outcomes post-cardiac arrest. Despite this utility, no single biomarker has sufficient power to predict patient outcomes independently. Ongoing research investigating these biomarkers remains an area of strong clinical interest. In conclusion, inflammatory, neurologic, and cardiac biomarkers all play a role in understanding both the short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest. To date, no single parameter has been shown to reliably predict outcome in cardiac arrest patients. Such biomarkers remain an area of active investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.