Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40475993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Machine learning-based coronary heart disease diagnosis model for type 2 diabetes patients.

Yingxi Chen, Chunyu Wang, Xiaozhu Liu, Minjie Duan, Tianyu Xiang, Haodong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingxi Chen *Department of Anatomy, Institute of Neuroscience, Chongqing Medical University Basic Medical College, Chongqing, China.
Chunyu Wang *Department of Anatomy, Institute of Neuroscience, Chongqing Medical University Basic Medical College, Chongqing, China.
Xiaozhu LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Minjie DuanChevidence Lab of Child and Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Tianyu XiangInformation Center, The University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haodong HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To establish a classification model for assisting the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: Patients with T2DM who underwent coronary angiography (CA) were enrolled from seven affiliated hospitals of Chongqing Medical University. Statistical differences in clinical variables between T2DM with or without CHD patients were verified using univariate analysis. The original data was divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The training set data were used to screen features using Logistic regression, Lasso regression, or recursive feature elimination (RFE). Five machine learning algorithms, including Logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme gradient boosting (XgBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), were selected for modeling. The performance of the models was verified through 5-fold cross-validation and the training set. Results: Clinical data were collected from 1943 patients with T2DM complicated with CHD and 574 T2DM patients without CHD. Univariate analysis identified 20 optimal risk factors, four of the risk factors had over 30% missing values, we ultimately included 16 risk factors. Logistic regression screened eight features, Lasso regression screened ten features, the RFE method screened eight, fourteen, sixteen, and thirteen features for SVM, RF, XgBoost, and LightGBM, respectively. Among all models, the XgBoost model based on features selected by RFE+LightGBM demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI, 0.779-0.847), accuracy of 0.799 (95% CI, 0.771-0.827), precision of 0.841 (95% CI, 0.812-0.868), recall of 0.920 (95% CI, 0.898-0.941), and F1-score of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.859-0.897) in the testing set. Conclusions: Based on T2DM data and machine learning theory, a Bayesian-optimized XgBoost model was established using the RFE+LightGBM method. This model effectively determines whether T2DM patients have CHD.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factorscoronary heart diseasesdiabetic comorbiditiesdiagnosis modelmachine learningtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40475993
PMCPMC12137098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.