ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
QFR measurements post CTO percutaneous coronary intervention: Can the long term outcome be predicted?
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Evidence to Practice: The Growing Role of Angiography-Derived Physiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Quantitative flow ratio after CTO PCI as a predictor of long-term outcomes.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: QFR, a non-invasive tool using 3D coronary artery imaging and fluid dynamics, helps assess revascularization benefits in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). Methods and Results: A retrospective study of 616 CTO patients who underwent PCI for CTO, with QFR assessed post-procedure. In a 5-year follow-up study involving 616 patients, the study used three tertiles (first tertile: QFR ≥ 0.88, second tertile: 0.85 ≤ QFR < 0.88, third tertile: QFR < 0.85) to determine the "cut-off" value. QFR showed strong predictive power with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95 % confidence interval: 0.77-0.83, P < 0.001). The occurrence of MACCEs among all participants in the study was 28.4 %. This rate varied across different groups, with 63.9 % in the low QFR tertile, 14.8 % in the middle tertile, and 12.6 % in the high QFR group. During the follow-up period, a variation in the occurrence of MACCEs was observed among the three groups (P < 0.05). Analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves indicated a statistically major difference in the cumulative rates of MACCEs across the groups. Competing risk regression analysis indicated that QFR is negatively associated with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and composite MACCEs. Conclusion: The study found a high prognostic value of physiological assessment using QFR after successful CTO intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.