ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2025
Prediction of Adolescent Suicide Attempt by Integrating Clinical, Neurocognitive and Geocoded Neighborhood Environment Data.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying past-year self-reported suicidality in outpatients with somatic symptom disorder using an interpretable machine-learning model: a multicenter study with an online calculator.BMC psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Parental Mental Health and Suicidal Behavior as Predictors of Adolescent Suicidal Ideation and Attempts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: Perspective, Lessons, and Future Directions.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and hypothesisSuicide attempt is a complex behavior influenced by a combination of factors including clinical, neurocognitive, and environmental. We aimed to leverage multimodal data collected during pre/early adolescence in research settings to predict self-report of suicide attempts by mid-late adolescence reported in pediatric settings. We hypothesized that different data types contribute to suicide attempt prediction and that clinical features would be most predictive of future suicide attempts. STUDY
designWe applied machine learning methods to clinical, neurocognitive, and geocoded neighborhood environmental data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort study (Mean age [SD] = 11.1 [2.2], 53.3% female, 51.4% Black participants) to predict suicide attempt reported ~5 years later in two independent pediatric settings: primary care (n = 922, 5.3% suicide attempt) or emergency department (n = 497, 8.2% suicide attempt). We tested prediction performance using all data versus using subsets of features identified by three feature selection algorithms (Lasso, Relief, Random Forest). STUDY
resultsIn the primary care sample, suicide attempt prediction using subsets of selected features (predictors) was good, achieving AUC = 0.75, sensitivity/specificity 0.76/0.77. The use of highest-ranking features yielded similar prediction performance in external validation using the independent emergency department sample with AUC = 0.74, sensitivity/specificity 0.66/0.70. Different algorithms identified different high-ranking features, but overall multiple data domains were represented among the highest-ranking features. Besides suicidal ideation, the highest-ranking clinical predictive symptoms were from psychosis or mania spectrum.
conclusionsResults suggest that data collected at a single timepoint during preadolescence can inform suicide attempt prediction during mid-late adolescence, in different clinical settings. Findings encourage incorporation of multiple data types including neurocognitive and geocoded data, alongside clinical data, in machine learning suicide attempt prediction pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.