Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479075›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Personalized deep neural networks reveal mechanisms of math learning disabilities in children.

Anthony Strock, Percy K Mistry, Vinod Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony StrockDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-561X
Percy K MistryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3055-4472
Vinod MenonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-9857

Funding

Interventions in Math Learning Disabilities: Cognitive and Neural CorrelatesR01HD059205 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vinod Menon · 2009 to 2026
$10.8M
Longitudinal Neurocognitive Studies of Mathematical Disabilities: trajectories and outcomesR37HD094623 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vinod Menon · 2018 to 2026
$6.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059205NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD094623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning disabilities affect a substantial proportion of children worldwide, with far-reaching consequences for their academic, professional, and personal lives. Here we develop digital twins-biologically plausible personalized deep neural networks (pDNNs)-to investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying learning disabilities in children. Our pDNN reproduces behavioral and neural activity patterns observed in affected children, including lower performance accuracy, slower learning rates, neural hyperexcitability, and reduced neural differentiation of numerical problems. Crucially, pDNN models reveal aberrancies in the geometry of manifold structure, providing a comprehensive view of how neural excitability influences both learning performance and the internal structure of neural representations. Our findings not only advance knowledge of the neurophysiological underpinnings of learning differences but also open avenues for targeted, personalized strategies designed to bridge cognitive gaps in affected children. This work reveals the power of digital twins integrating artificial intelligence and neuroscience to uncover mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental disorders.

Indexed as

Learning DisabilitiesMathematicsNeural Networks, ComputerChildDeep LearningFemaleHumansLearningMale

Identifiers

PMID40479075
PMCPMC13109960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.