ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2023
[Self-reported cognitive glucose sensitivity: association with long-term blood-glucose-levels and diabetes-related distress in individuals with type 1 diabetes].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is often associated with a significant impact on psychological functioning and well-being. Effective prevention and health promotion of persons with diabetes requires a deeper understanding of this problem, which is based on the interaction of psychological and biological processes. Objectives: The study aims to contribute to the understanding of how subjective cognitive glucose sensitivity (cGS) is related to long-term blood glucose levels (HbA1c) and diabetes-related distress in people with type 1 diabetes. Materials and methods: As part of an online study, the relevant variables (cognitive glucose sensitivity [cGS], latest measured HbA1c, diabetes-related distress) were recorded economically using self-report questionnaires. Results: In a group of 354 adults with type 1 diabetes (283 women), we found significant correlations between cGS and HbA1c ( Conclusion: Our results indicate that cGS is physiologically determined and related to established diabetes-related measures (HbA1c and diabetes-related stress). Overall, the findings reaffirm a need for intensified research and development of comprehensive care for persons with diabetes, integrating experience and behaviors of the affected person's mind as a substantial part. Ultimately, this could clarify the extent to which the treatment of cGS can have a preventive effect against negative impacts of diabetes on psychological well-being and would, thus, be beneficial to the health promotion of affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.