ArticleAging and disease2025
A Standardized Protocol for Mouse Longevity Studies in Preclinical Drug Development.
Article in Aging and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although aging is increasingly recognized as a key factor in chronic disease management, preclinical drug development rarely incorporates direct assessments of lifespan. To date, no biotechnology company has conducted a full mouse lifespan study for a therapeutic agent prior to human clinical trials, despite widespread chronic use of many approved drugs. This oversight stems from a lack of standardized protocols for the incorporation of mouse lifespan studies, high costs, limited commercial incentives, and regulatory risks associated with long-term data. Here, we present a comprehensive and scalable protocol for conducting mouse longevity studies in the early stages of drug development. Being aware of monetary constraints in the drug discovery process, we propose a basic design for a longevity study on ~250 (176 males and 72 females) genetically heterogeneous mice (UM-HET3) per group, with survival curves as primary endpoint, and propose enhanced study design options only if budget allows. Our framework provides a standardized foundation for integrating longevity assessments into routine drug development, offering the potential to uncover long-term risks or benefits that traditional toxicology studies may overlook. Broad implementation of such protocols could support the development of safer and more effective therapeutics for chronic diseases, while opening new avenues for discovery of substances that could slow down the rate of aging, known as geroprotectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.