Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40480669›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Postoperative rehabilitation training adherence and influencing factors in adults with traumatic fractures in China: a cross-sectional study.

Ziyang Wang, Renwei Zhang, Yangming Hu, Yihui Xing, Xiaochen Jiang, Weifeng Wang, Xueling Qiu, Lu Tang, Shumei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziyang Wang *Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3174-1894
Renwei Zhang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yangming Hu *Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yihui Xing *Qingdao Stomatological Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xiaochen JiangShandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Weifeng WangShandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Xueling QiuDepartment of Stomatology, PLA 960th Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lu TangDepartment of Stomatology, PLA 960th Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shumei ShiDepartment of Nephrology, PLA 960th Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China 17862830987@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore rehabilitation training adherence as well as its related influencing factors among adult patients with traumatic limb fractures to provide a basis for clinical intervention strategies.

designCross-sectional study.

settingDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.

participantsAdults within 1 year postoperative for traumatic limb fractures and who underwent rehabilitation training were included in this study.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresPatient information was collected using a self-designed general information form. Rehabilitation training adherence was evaluated using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (0/64, higher values=higher adherence). Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation were assessed using sociodemographic data, ability to perform daily life (ADL), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Visual Analogue Scale. Pearson's (r) and determination (R

resultsBetween December 2022 and December 2023, 180 subjects were recruited. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 93 years, with a mean age of 41.5 years (SD 15.6). The mean Exercise Adherence score was 30.31 (SD 5.8). Adherence to postoperative rehabilitation training tended to be lower in participants of older age (-1.30; 95% CI -2.14 to -0.46; p=0.003), and those who had higher pain scores on the movement (moderate pain (-3.25; 95% CI -4.56 to -1.95; p<0.001) to severe pain (-5.42; 95% CI -7.31 to -3.54; p<0.001)), less education (-2.90; 95% CI -4.17 to -1.64; p<0.001), fewer family income (-1.82; 95% CI -2.77 to -0.87; p<0.001), treated at home (-1.90; 95% CI -3.35 to -0.45; p=0.011) and with lower GSES scores (0.25; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.34; p<0.001).

conclusionsPatients with limb fractures require rehabilitation but often struggle with adherence to interventions. Strategies that focus on targeted education programmes, pain management and self-efficacy improvement may be considered to guide future research and programmatic approaches to enhance adherence to rehabilitation training.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFractures, BonePatient ComplianceActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacyYoung AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFractures, BonePain managementREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40480669
PMCPMC12161302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.