ArticleScientific reports2025
Data driven assessment of built environment impacts on urban health across United States cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Risk Stratification in Obesity Care: From Diagnosis to Personalised Treatment Pathways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biophilic design, neuroarchitecture and therapeutic home environments: harnessing medicinal properties of intentionally-designed spaces to enhance digital health outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The built environment plays a crucial role in urban health through its constant interaction with residents. Yet, a comprehensive analysis across multiple U.S. cities covering different geographical conditions has been missing. This study examines the impact of the built environment on mental, physical, and overall health in 19 major U.S. cities across diverse climate zones, aiming to discover the influential factors and create a predictive health model for the entire nation. Utilizing a convolutional neural network, this research extracted building characteristics from google street view and employed a multiple regression model, XGBoost, support vector regression (SVR), decision tree, and random forest, achieving R-squared values of 0.75, 0.76, and 0.82 for mental, physical, and general health, respectively. The findings revealed certain building features profoundly influence urban health, including lead paint as a persistent health hazard, while air conditioning boosts health outcomes. Traditional materials like wood and masonry, common in older buildings, are linked to better health compared to modern materials. The study also reveals significant geographic variations, underscoring the intricate relationship between architecture and public health. By highlighting the vital role of building features in shaping urban health, this research provides a foundation for policymakers to inform building regulations, prioritize vulnerable areas, and support health-oriented urban design, ultimately contributing to healthier, more livable urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.