Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Uncovering candidate Nanog-Helper genes in early mouse embryo differentiation using differential entropy and network inference.

Francisco Prista von Bonhorst, Olivier Gandrillon, Ulysse Herbach, Corentin Robert, Claire Chazaud, Yannick De Decker, Didier Gonze, Geneviève Dupont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco Prista von BonhorstUnit of Theoretical Chronobiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050, Brussels, Belgium. fpristas@ulb.be.
Olivier GandrillonUniv Lyon, CNRS, ENS de Lyon, INSERM, UMR5239, LBMC, U1210, 69364, Lyon, France.
Ulysse HerbachCNRS, Inria, IECL, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Corentin RobertUnit of Theoretical Chronobiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Claire ChazaudCNRS, INSERM, GReD Institute, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yannick De DeckerNon-linear Physical Chemistry Unit, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Didier GonzeUnit of Theoretical Chronobiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Geneviève DupontUnit of Theoretical Chronobiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the preimplantation mammalian embryo, stochastic cell-to-cell expression heterogeneity is followed by signal reinforcement to initiate the specification of Inner Cell Mass (ICM) cells into Epiblast (Epi). The expression of NANOG, the key transcription factor for the Epi fate, is necessary but not sufficient: coincident expression of other factors is required. To identify possible Nanog-helper genes, we analyzed gene expression variability in five time-stamped single-cell transcriptomic datasets using differential entropy, a quantitative measure of cell-to-cell heterogeneity. The entropy of Nanog displays a peak-shaped temporal pattern from the 16-cell to the 64-cell stage, consistent with its key role in Epi specification. By estimating the entropy profiles of the 21 genes common to all five datasets, we identified three genes - Pecam1, Sox2, and Hnf4a - whose variability in expression patterns mirrors that of Nanog. We further performed gene regulatory network inference using CARDAMOM, an algorithm that exploits temporal dynamics and transcriptional bursting. The results revealed that these three genes exhibit reciprocal activation with Nanog at the 32-cell stage. This regulatory motif reinforces fate-switching decisions and co-expression states. Our innovative analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data thus uncovers a likely role for Pecam1, Sox2, and Hnf4a as key genes that, when coincidentally expressed with Nanog, initiate ICM differentiation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEmbryo, MammalianGene Regulatory NetworksNanog Homeobox ProteinAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentEntropyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4MiceSingle-Cell AnalysisSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscriptomeHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4Nanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouseSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID40481039
PMCPMC12144205

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.