ArticleScientific reports2025
Uncovering candidate Nanog-Helper genes in early mouse embryo differentiation using differential entropy and network inference.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the preimplantation mammalian embryo, stochastic cell-to-cell expression heterogeneity is followed by signal reinforcement to initiate the specification of Inner Cell Mass (ICM) cells into Epiblast (Epi). The expression of NANOG, the key transcription factor for the Epi fate, is necessary but not sufficient: coincident expression of other factors is required. To identify possible Nanog-helper genes, we analyzed gene expression variability in five time-stamped single-cell transcriptomic datasets using differential entropy, a quantitative measure of cell-to-cell heterogeneity. The entropy of Nanog displays a peak-shaped temporal pattern from the 16-cell to the 64-cell stage, consistent with its key role in Epi specification. By estimating the entropy profiles of the 21 genes common to all five datasets, we identified three genes - Pecam1, Sox2, and Hnf4a - whose variability in expression patterns mirrors that of Nanog. We further performed gene regulatory network inference using CARDAMOM, an algorithm that exploits temporal dynamics and transcriptional bursting. The results revealed that these three genes exhibit reciprocal activation with Nanog at the 32-cell stage. This regulatory motif reinforces fate-switching decisions and co-expression states. Our innovative analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data thus uncovers a likely role for Pecam1, Sox2, and Hnf4a as key genes that, when coincidentally expressed with Nanog, initiate ICM differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.