ArticleHuman genomics2025
Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on genomic newborn screening studies: design, implementation, and outcomes.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Role of next generation sequencing in neonatal diagnosis and screening.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Toward universal screening for disease-causing alleles: Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease as a model.Journal of human immunity · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNewborn genomic screening offers the potential for early detection and management of genetic disorders. Understanding parental perspectives is essential before integrating genomic testing into standard newborn screening.
methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study surveyed 568 parents in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). An online self-administered validated and piloted questionnaire was used to gather information on demographic characteristic and perspectives regarding newborn genomic screening. Data were analysed using R version 4.4.3.
resultsMost parents (78.2%) supported integrating genomics into newborn screening programs, with 63.5% stating it requires distinct management from standard screening. Females preferred geneticists (38.2% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001) and hospitals (45.1% vs. 39.2%, p < 0.001) for discussions, with 74.2% emphasizing explicit consent compared to 68.5% of males (p < 0.002). Treatability (82.7%), age of symptom onset (74.1%), and severity (72.2%) were key decision-making factors. Additionally, 66.7% preferred genomic testing to be covered by insurance, and 82.2% supported storing genomic data for future use.
conclusionParents participated in the study strongly support genomic newborn screening. Gender-based differences emphasize the need for tailored communication and culturally sensitive strategies to inform policy development and implementation of newborn genomic screening program in the UAE and similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.