Evidence mapPaperPMID 40481853Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2025

Differential Microbial Composition and Fiber Degradation in Two Sloth Species (Bradypus variegatus and Choloepus hoffmanni).

Priscila Chaverri, Efraín Escudero-Leyva, Darling Mora-Rojas, Andrea Calvo-Obando, Mariana González, Esteban Escalante-Campos, Esteve Mesén-Porras, Daniela Wicki-Emmenegger, Diego Rojas-Gätjens, Judith Avey-Arroyo and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Priscila ChaverriDepartment of Natural Sciences, Bowie State University, Bowie, MD, USA. pchaverri@bowiestate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-6033
Efraín Escudero-LeyvaCentro de Investigaciones en Productos Naturales (CIPRONA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Darling Mora-RojasCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Andrea Calvo-ObandoCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Mariana GonzálezThe Sloth Sanctuary of Costa Rica, Limón, Costa Rica.
Esteban Escalante-CamposCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Esteve Mesén-PorrasCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Daniela Wicki-EmmeneggerCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Diego Rojas-GätjensCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Judith Avey-ArroyoThe Sloth Sanctuary of Costa Rica, Limón, Costa Rica.
Mariana Campos-HernándezCentro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot), CeNAT-CONARE, San José, Costa Rica.
Erick CastellónEscuela de Química, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Andrés Moreira-SotoCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Jan Felix DrexlerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Max ChavarríaCentro de Investigaciones en Productos Naturales (CIPRONA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57592642Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa Rica VI 809-C3-102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sloths have the slowest digestion among mammals, requiring 5-20 times longer to digest food than other herbivores, which suggests differences in their gut microbiota, particularly in plant-fiber-degrading microorganisms. Bradypus variegatus has a lower metabolic rate and moves less than Choloepus hoffmanni. However, no comprehensive studies have compared the microbiota (e.g., fungi) of these species. We hypothesized that differences in digestion and metabolism between the two species would be reflected in their microbiota composition and functionality, which we characterized using metagenomics, metabarcoding, and cellulose degradation. Results revealed significant differences in microbiota composition and functionality. Both species are dominated by bacteria; fungi comprised only 0.06-0.5% of metagenomic reads. Neocallimastigomycota, an anaerobic fungus involved in fiber breakdown in other herbivores, was found in low abundance, especially in B. variegatus. Bacterial communities showed subtle differences: C. hoffmanni was dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while B. variegatus showed higher Actinomycetota. Expected herbivore bacterial taxa (e.g., Fibrobacter and Prevotella) were scarce. Functional analysis showed a low abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes essential for polysaccharide breakdown. Cellulose degradation assays confirmed that sloths digest only ~ 3-30% of ingested plant material. This research sheds light on the potential multidirectional links between the gut microbiota, metabolism, and digestion.

Indexed as

BacteriaDietary FiberFungiGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCelluloseMetagenomicsCelluloseDietary Fiber

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.