ReviewNursing open2025
ChatGPT Applications in Nursing: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Review in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clarifying the Evidence Base for "Personalized Learning Path Design" Claims in Peng et al. (2025)-A Letter to the Editor.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Information Generated by ChatGPT on Preventing Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Infections.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Safety and accuracy of AI in triaging patients in the emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- ChatGPT in Nursing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges in Education, Research, and Clinical Practice.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWith the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence technologies, natural language processing tools represented by ChatGPT have been increasingly used. This narrative review explored the application, challenges, and future directions of ChatGPT in nursing.
designNarrative review.
methodsThe searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The empirical studies of ChatGPT in nursing were selected and explored.
resultsChatGPT has been integrated into clinical nursing support, nurse education and patient service optimisation, demonstrating potential in improving efficiency and patient outcomes. However, technical limitations, ethical-legal issues and implementation barriers pose challenges to its widespread adoption. In future, technology iteration, standard development and multimodal convergence are needed to promote the construction of trusted artificial intelligence nursing systems. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This narrative review is based on a secondary analysis of existing literature and does not directly involve patient or public contributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.