Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40482901›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2025

A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.

Oscar E Ruiz, Joost B Wagenaar, Bella Mehta, Ilias Ziogas, Lyndie Swanson, Kim C Worley, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida, Alisa J Johnson, Jyl Boline, Jacqueline Boccanfuso and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Oscar E RuizDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Joost B WagenaarDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bella MehtaDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Ilias ZiogasSPARC K-Core, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lyndie SwansonCollege of Science and Engineering, Houston Christian University, Houston, TX, USA.
Kim C WorleyDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Yenisel Cruz-AlmeidaPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Alisa J JohnsonPain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Pain Research Center, National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jyl BolineSPARC K-Core, La Jolla, CA, USA; Informed Minds, Inc, USA.
Jacqueline BoccanfusoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
RE-JOIN Consortium
Maryann E MartoneSPARC K-Core, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: mmartone@ucsd.edu.
Nele A HaeltermanDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: nhaelter@bcm.edu.

Funding

RE-JOIN NEURONAL ANATOMY, CONNECTIVITY, AND PHENOTYPIC INNERVATION OF THE KNEE JOINTUC2AR082200 · NIAMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Benjamin R Arenkiel, Brendan Lee · 2022 to 2026
$14.4M
Precision Mapping of Knee Pain in Osteoarthritis: Understanding differences between pain with activity and restUC2AR082186 · NIAMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOTZ, MARTIN K, MALFAIT, ANNE-MARIE · 2022 to 2025
$11.9M
Innervation of the knee and TMJUC2AR082196 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Kyle D Allen, Alejandro Jose Almarza · 2022 to 2026
$11.2M
K-CORE: Curation and Knowledge Management for SPARCOT2OD030541 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DE BONO, BERNARD, MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2020 to 2024
$10.3M
Neural Architecture of the Murine and Human Temporomandibular JointUC2AR082197 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CAI, DAWEN, DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER RYAN · 2022 to 2025
$9.5M
Comprehensive functional phenotyping of trigeminal neurons innervating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tissues in male, female and aged mice, primates, and humans with and without TMJ disorders (TMJD)..UC2AR082195 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ARMEN N AKOPIAN, LINDSEY J MACPHERSON · 2022 to 2026
$8.4M
Deconstructing Disparities in Lupus PregnanciesK23AR082991 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI Bella Mehta · 2024 to 2026
$528k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR082991NIAMS NIH HHS UC2 AR082186NIAMS NIH HHS UC2 AR082195NIAMS NIH HHS UC2 AR082196NIAMS NIH HHS UC2 AR082197NIAMS NIH HHS UC2 AR082200NIH HHS OT2 OD030541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large, interdisciplinary team science initiatives are increasingly leveraged to uncover novel insights into complex scientific problems. Such projects typically aim to produce large, harmonized datasets that can be analyzed to yield breakthrough discoveries using cutting-edge scientific methods. Successfully harmonizing and integrating datasets generated by different technologies and research groups is a considerable task, which requires an extensive supportive framework that is built by all members involved. Such a data harmonization framework includes a shared language to communicate across teams and disciplines, harmonized methods and protocols, (meta)data standards and common data elements, and the appropriate infrastructure to support the framework's development and implementation. In addition, a supportive data harmonization framework also entails adopting processes to decide on which elements to harmonize and to help individual team members implement agreed-upon data workflows in their own laboratories/centers. Building an effective data harmonization framework requires buy-in, team building, and significant effort from all members involved. While the nature and individual elements of these frameworks are project-specific, some common challenges typically arise that are independent of the research questions, scientific techniques, or model systems involved. In this perspective, we build on our collective experiences as part of the REstoring JOINt health and function to reduce pain (RE-JOIN) Consortium to provide guidance for developing research-centered data collection and analysis pipelines that enable downstream integrated analyses within and across diverse teams.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchInterdisciplinary ResearchResearch DesignWorkflowHumansBig dataChronic painCommon data elementsData harmonizationData integrationJoint diseaseMetadata standardTeam science

Identifiers

PMID40482901
PMCPMC12233188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.