ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Real-time estimations of blood glucose concentrations from sweat measurements using the local density random walk model.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sweat provides a non-invasive alternative to blood draws, enabling glucose-concentration monitoring for both healthy individuals and diabetic patients. In our previous work, we demonstrated a strategy that accurately estimates blood glucose concentrations from sweat measurements. However, this method involves time-consuming simulations using a biophysical model, limiting its application to offline use. The goal of this study is to propose an approach that increases computational efficiency, thereby facilitating real-time estimation of blood glucose concentrations using sweat-sensing technology. To this end, we propose replacing the original biophysical model with the Local Density Random Walk (LDRW) model. This is justified because both models describe the pharmacokinetics of glucose transport through a convective-diffusion process. The performance of the LDRW model and the original biophysical model are compared in terms of estimation accuracy, computational efficiency, and model complexity, using seven datasets from the literature. The estimation of blood glucose concentrations using the LDRW model closely approximates that of the original model, with a root mean square difference of just 0.04 mmol/L between the two models' estimates. Remarkably, the LDRW model significantly reduces the average computational time to 2.6 s per data point, representing only 0.7% of the time required by the original method. Furthermore, the LDRW model demonstrates a smaller corrected Akaike Information Criterion value than the original method, indicating an improved balance between goodness of fit and model complexity. The proposed novel approach paves the way for the clinical adoption of sweat-sensing technology for non-invasive, real-time monitoring of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.