Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483621›Full record

ArticleSports medicine - open2025

A Response To "Why Should the Next Generation of Youth Guidelines Prioritize Vigorous Physical Activity?"

Charles B Corbin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Charles B CorbinCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, United States. chuck.corbin@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0630-7377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent published Current Opinion in Sports Medicine-Open, Chaabene, Markov, & Schega make the case for vigorous physical activity (VPA), including high-intensity exercise (HIE) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), as a priority in future physical activity (PA) guidelines for children and adolescents. Their article provides evidence of the effectiveness of different types of VPA for improving health-related fitness and reducing health risks among children and adolescents. The authors recommend that the “…next generation of PA recommendations should place a greater emphasis on the significance of vigorous physical activity for youth”. In this paper the recommendation for making VPA, including HIE and HIIT, a priority in future PA guidelines for youth is examined. Alternative priorities are provided.

Identifiers

PMID40483621
PMCPMC12146232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.