Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483905›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Probiotic application to hatching egg surface supports microbiota development and acquisition in broiler embryos and hatchlings.

Mairui Gao, Yuying Ren, Si Lu, Ragini Reddyvari, Mary Anne Amalaradjou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mairui GaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Yuying RenDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Si LuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Ragini ReddyvariDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Mary Anne AmalaradjouDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Electronic address: mary_anne.amalaradjou@uconn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern poultry production, hatchlings primarily acquire their initial gut microbiota from the hatchery environment. This, in turn, results in delayed gut microbiota acquisition and a less diverse microbiota. However, the gut microbiota in the hatchling and the neonate is crucial for the normal development of the immune system and healthy gut function. Hence, promoting healthy microbiota development and acquisition in hatchlings is critical. To this end, we determined the potential for probiotic spray application to hatching eggs to support microbiota acquisition in the hatchling. A total of 100 hatching eggs (Ross 308) were either sprayed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Control) or probiotics [∼9 log CFU/egg of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NRRL B-442 (LR) or Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DUP 13076 (LP)] during incubation. Six eggs were sacrificed for sample collection at each sampling point. Eggshells were washed with sterile PBS buffer and collected at embryonic day (D) 0, 7, 14, 18, and 20. Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) was collected at D7, 14, 18, and 20, and intestine at D14, 18, and 20. At hatch, chicks were euthanized, and the cecal and ileal samples were collected for microbiota characterization. Results indicate that spray application of LP and LR significantly modulated the microbiota associated with the eggshell, CAM, embryonic intestine, and hatchling gut. Further predictive analysis revealed CAM to be a significant source for the microbiota associated with the hatchling gut. Also, application of LP and LR led to significant enrichment in Lactobacillus populations and potential probiotic taxa, including Enterococcus, in the hatchling gut. Moreover, functional profile analysis revealed that microbial communities associated with the hatchling gut microbiota in the probiotic groups were enriched for nutrient and energy metabolism, which could not only support embryo development but also post-hatch growth. In conclusion, in ovo spray application of probiotics to the egg's surface can be a potential approach to support microbiota acquisition in hatchlings.

Indexed as

ChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusOvumProbioticsAnimalsChick EmbryoBroiler embryoHatchlingIn ovo probiotic applicationMicrobiota acquisition

Identifiers

PMID40483905
PMCPMC12175716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.