ArticlePerspectives in biology and medicine2025
Centering Health Equity in an Increasingly Digital Environment.
Article in Perspectives in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Predictors of Appointment Non-Adherence in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating trust into artificial intelligence for medicine: using diabetes as the exemplar disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the Impact of Remote Leadership on Health Care Delivery: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health care has become increasingly digitized. Given that under-invested health systems and patient populations frequently have worse access to the newest innovations, there is concern that this digitalization may exacerbate preexisting health inequities. This article discusses the multiple ways that digital health may increase health inequities. Using case studies presented by digital health leaders in different roles and settings, it provides examples of how health systems can adopt and implement innovative tools to deliver care while centering health equity. The case studies highlight five guidelines that health-care systems should consider as they weigh the equity implications of adopting any digital tool: auditing benefits, institutional incentives, elevating frontline and patient perspectives, long-term community engagement, and protecting data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.