ArticleKidney international reports2025
Early Determination of Tacrolimus Concentration-Dose Ratio Identifies Risk of Allograft Loss in Kidney Transplantation.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Ratio in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: An Exploratory Study of Metabolizer Phenotyping and Clinical Outcomes.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fast tacrolimus-metabolizing kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) (i.e., tacrolimus trough-level/total daily dose [C0/D < 1.05]) have poorer allograft function; however, their identification in a real-life setting is challenging. We investigated the reproducibility of tacrolimus metabolic status during the first months after transplantation and its association with long-term allograft outcomes. Methods: All KTRs between 2000 and 2019 with a functional allograft at 1 month and receiving tacrolimus in our center were included. Fast or slow tacrolimus metabolizers were classified according to the time spent with a C0/D < 1.05 (> 75% = High, < 25% = Low) at various time points posttransplantation. We first determined the earliest accurate time for patient categorization by investigating C0/D variability during the first months. Second, a multivariate cause-specific Cox model studying allograft outcomes was performed in groups identified by their status determined from the earliest accurate timepoint after transplantation. Results: Among 1979 patients included in the analysis, 2 months was the earliest accurate timepoint to determine High patients (85% of High patients identified at 2 months remained High long-term, Brier score = 0.06). Multivariate analysis revealed that High patients determined at 2 months ( Conclusion: C0/D is a simple and pragmatic tool capable of identifying patients at risk of rejection and allograft failure as early as the second month posttransplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.