ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2025
Is It Safe to Use Tranexamic Acid for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and the Emerging Role of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trans-4-(aminomethyl)-cyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid, also known as tranexamic acid (TXA), has occasionally been used to prevent postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after burr hole craniotomy (BC). However, there is a lack of data about the safety and efficacy of TXA administration after BC. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Cochrane Handbook Standards Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searching databases up to January 2024 for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating TXA. The primary outcome was CSDH recurrence and reoperation. The secondary outcome was thrombosis risk and mortality rate. Ten studies were included, comprising 14,836 patients with CSDH who underwent surgical treatment. Five studies were randomized controlled trials, while the other two case series and three cohort studies. The overall pooled hematoma recurrence rate in the group of patients who used TXA as an adjuvant treatment to the surgical intervention (TXA group), compared with patients who only used surgery to treat CSDH (control group), was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [0.03-0.08],
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.