ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Glyphosate-microbial interactions: metagenomic insights and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- How Glyphosate and Its Derivatives Influence Antimicrobial Resistance Emergence and Transmission: A One Health Perspective.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Orchard management alters citrus root and rhizosphere microbiomes with functional consequences for plant performance.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Maize recruits beneficial microorganisms via rhizosphere metabolites as signals to construct a functional network for saline-alkaline stress resistance.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Glyphosate resistance as a potential driver for the dissemination of multidrug-resistant clinical strains.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Application of glyphosate or paraquat before the emergence of maize plants (Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] is the most widely used systematic non-selective herbicide worldwide. However, there is increasing concern about its potential impacts on soil microbial communities, which play crucial roles in maintaining soil functions, plant health, and crop productivity. While glyphosate can be inactivated in soil through strong sorption, desorption remains a significant challenge as glyphosate residues and metabolites can exert toxicity effects on agroecosystems, particularly by altering microbial diversity and functionality. This review synthesizes current knowledge on glyphosate's behavior in soils and advancements in metagenomics approaches (including their limitations) to better understand the complex interactions between glyphosate and microbial communities in genetically modified (GM) cropping systems. Glyphosate has demonstrated antimicrobial properties, inhibiting the growth of various bacteria and fungi. Conversely, other studies suggest that glyphosate may enhance microbial richness, promoting the proliferation of potential glyphosate degraders (e.g.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.