ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025
Donor-specific digital twin for living donor liver transplant recovery.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topological Entropy Correlates with the Predictive Power of Multiplexed Ensemble Reservoir Computing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Transplantation immunology: paradigm shift from systemic suppression to microenvironment remodeling and precision modulation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Liver Innervation in Health and Disease: Neuroimmune-Neurovascular Interface and Future Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The remarkable capacity of the liver to regenerate its lost mass after resection makes living donor liver transplantation a successful treatment option. However, donor heterogeneity significantly influences recovery trajectories, highlighting the need for individualized monitoring. With the rising incidence of liver diseases, safer transplant procedures and improved donor care are urgently needed. Current clinical markers provide only limited snapshots of recovery, making it challenging to predict long-term outcomes. Following partial hepatectomy, precise liver mass recovery requires tightly regulated hepatocyte proliferation. We identified distinct gene expression patterns associated with liver regeneration by analyzing blood-derived gene expression measurements from twelve donors followed over a year. Using a deep learning-based framework, we integrated these patterns with a mathematical model of hepatocyte transitions to develop a personalized, progressive mechanistic digital twin-a virtual liver model that predicts donor-specific recovery trajectories. Central to our approach is a mechanistically identifiable latent space, defined by variables derived from a physiologically grounded differential equation model of liver regeneration, which enables biologically interpretable, bidirectional mapping between gene expression data and model dynamics. This approach integrates clinical genomics and computational modeling to enhance post-surgical care, ensuring safer transplants and improved donor recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.