Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486178›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025

Donor-specific digital twin for living donor liver transplant recovery.

Suvankar Halder, Michael C Lawrence, Giuliano Testa, Vipul Periwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suvankar HalderLaboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3070-4756
Michael C LawrenceBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, 75204, United States.
Giuliano TestaAnnette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 76104, United States.
Vipul PeriwalLaboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States.

Funding

Release of MIF protein complexes in vivo: response to inflammationR21DK075059 · NIDDK · BAY PINES FOUNDATION, INC. · PI VERA, PEDRO L · 2006 to 2007
$326k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK075059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable capacity of the liver to regenerate its lost mass after resection makes living donor liver transplantation a successful treatment option. However, donor heterogeneity significantly influences recovery trajectories, highlighting the need for individualized monitoring. With the rising incidence of liver diseases, safer transplant procedures and improved donor care are urgently needed. Current clinical markers provide only limited snapshots of recovery, making it challenging to predict long-term outcomes. Following partial hepatectomy, precise liver mass recovery requires tightly regulated hepatocyte proliferation. We identified distinct gene expression patterns associated with liver regeneration by analyzing blood-derived gene expression measurements from twelve donors followed over a year. Using a deep learning-based framework, we integrated these patterns with a mathematical model of hepatocyte transitions to develop a personalized, progressive mechanistic digital twin-a virtual liver model that predicts donor-specific recovery trajectories. Central to our approach is a mechanistically identifiable latent space, defined by variables derived from a physiologically grounded differential equation model of liver regeneration, which enables biologically interpretable, bidirectional mapping between gene expression data and model dynamics. This approach integrates clinical genomics and computational modeling to enhance post-surgical care, ensuring safer transplants and improved donor recovery.

Indexed as

deep learningdigital twinliver regenerationliving donor liver transplant (LDLT)mathematical modelingpartial hepatectomy

Identifiers

PMID40486178
PMCPMC12141195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.