Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486315›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Optimizing Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Complications, Management Techniques, and Lessons Learned From Our Clinical Experience.

Sakshi Agarwal, Sangeeta Rai, Lalit Kumar, Anubhuti Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sakshi AgarwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Sangeeta RaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Lalit KumarDepartment of Urology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.
Anubhuti GuptaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic hysterectomy has emerged as a preferred surgical option for managing various gynecological conditions due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the demographics, indications, complications, and recovery outcomes associated with laparoscopic hysterectomy in a cohort of patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 117 patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy at a single institution. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, surgical indications, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and discharge timing. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the relationships between these variables.

resultsMost patients were between 41 and 50 years (58.1%), with a significant proportion being multiparous (47.9%). The primary indications for surgery included fibroids (42.7%) and abnormal uterine bleeding (35.0%). Intraoperative complications were low, with bladder injury occurring in 2.6% and bowel injury in 0.85% of cases. The conversion rate to open surgery was 5.1%. Postoperatively, complications such as intestinal obstruction, paralytic ileus, peritonitis, and port-site infection were reported in 0.85% of patients each, while 96.6% experienced no complications. Most patients (89.75%) were discharged within 48 hours after surgery.

conclusionThe findings of this study support the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic hysterectomy as a surgical option for women with gynecological conditions. Despite some patients requiring extended hospitalization, the overall hospital stay and complication rates were low, reinforcing the viability of laparoscopic techniques in clinical practice. Future research should focus on larger, prospective, or randomized multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Indexed as

complicationshysterectomyhysterosalphingectomylaparoscopictotal laparoscopic hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID40486315
PMCPMC12142450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.